Virginia Minor. [Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division, LC-USZ62-95372]
The Old Courthouse in St. Louis, where Minor’s case was first heard in 1873. [State Historical Society of Missouri, Charles Trefts Photograph Collection, P0034-1012]

Decided in 1873 by the Supreme Court of Missouri and in 1874 by the US Supreme Court, Minor v. Happersett held that women’s suffrage was not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment and that states therefore had the right to restrict voting on the basis of gender. This legal setback for the suffrage movement led to a shift in strategy, with suffragists changing their focus to passing legislation that would amend state constitutions and the US Constitution rather than going through the courts to contest women’s right to vote.

As the Civil War drew to a close, women across the nation, including in Missouri, renewed their efforts to gain the right to vote. Virginia Louisa Minor of St. Louis was one of those courageous women. Born into an affluent family of “distinguished Virginia planters,” Minor had the commitment, resources, and time to dedicate herself to furthering women’s rights. In 1867 she petitioned the Missouri state legislature to extend the right to vote to women. The petition, signed by 355 women, was rejected by the Missouri House of Representatives by a vote of 89 to 5. Minor then attempted to register to vote in the 1872 presidential election. As recounted in the October 16, 1872, St. Louis Times, Reese Happersett, the St. Louis registrar, “firmly, but politely declined” to register Minor to vote. Minor responded by filing a lawsuit against Happersett, one of several such challenges made by women across the United States at about the same time. Ironically, Minor had to file the case through her husband, Francis Minor, since married women did not have standing to sue in Missouri courts (they would not gain this right until 1889).

The case was heard before the circuit court in St. Louis in 1873. Minor based her argument on a clause within the Missouri constitution then in effect. She argued that article 2, section 18 of the 1865 state constitution, which stated “every male citizen of the United States, &c., . . . shall be entitled to vote,” violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution. Minor argued that with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1866, states no longer should “exercise unlimited and absolute control over the elective franchise of citizens of the United States”; as citizens, women were entitled to all of the protections and privileges attendant to citizenship.         

When the circuit court ruled against her, Minor appealed to the Supreme Court of Missouri, which heard the case in March 1873. Judge Henry M. Vories delivered the court’s opinion that the state constitution and laws of Missouri did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. The court opined that the intention of the Fourteenth Amendment was to extend suffrage to recently freed male slaves over the age of twenty-one and that the amendment protected the right of the states to restrict suffrage on the basis of gender.

            Minor appealed this decision too, and the US Supreme Court heard her case in 1874. In October of that year, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously to affirm the Missouri court’s decision. The nine Supreme Court justices agreed with previous rulings that the US Constitution did not restrain states from creating laws restricting the “important trust” of voting to men alone. Women, although considered citizens, were not inherently granted the right to vote—that determination was to be left to the states.

The refusal of the courts to grant suffrage for Minor and other women caused significant repercussions within the suffragist movement. The movement split into two factions, the National Woman Suffrage Association and the American Woman Suffrage Association. The National Woman Suffrage Association supported a federal amendment to attain suffrage, while the American Woman Suffrage Association favored state-level legislation. Minor chose to disassociate from the Woman’s Suffrage Association in Missouri, which she had cofounded, when the organization’s members voted to affiliate with the American Woman Suffrage Association. For the rest of her life, she remained steadfast in her belief that the federal government should grant women suffrage.

Minor did not live long enough to exercise the right to vote. After her death in 1894, it would be another twenty-six years before the Nineteenth Amendment to the US Constitution guaranteed that right to women in Missouri and throughout the United States. Minor’s landmark case was nevertheless an important step in the long struggle for women’s suffrage.

Further Reading

Keyssar, Alexander. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books, 2009.

Minor v. Happersett. 53 Mo. 58 (1873).

Minor v. Happersett. 88 US 162 (1874).

Morris, Monia Cook. “The History of Woman Suffrage in Missouri, 1867–1901.” Missouri Historical Review 25, no. 1 (October 1930): 67–82.

Scott, Mary Semple, ed. “History of the Woman Suffrage Movement in Missouri.” Missouri Historical Review 14, no. 3–4 (April–July 1920): 281–384.

Wagner, Sally Roesch, ed. The Women’s Suffrage Movement. New York: Penguin, 2019.

Weiss, Elaine. The Woman’s Hour: The Great Fight to Win the Vote. New York: Viking, 2018.

Published March 4, 2021; Last updated September 27, 2021

Rights Statement

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommerical-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)